Comments on: ICC Test rankings system https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/ Independent and irreverent cricket writing Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:28:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.3 By: John https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23927 Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:28:41 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23927 i believe that england will easily beat south africa in the next upcoming test match.

but surprisingly, India played fewer test matches than england but still India is on number one in the world.

actually, it is a huge shame that India with over one billion population has never been able to reach on number one in either test or one day except this time; and that even could be just temporary. that’s really shame for India.

i believe India does not play the same number of test matches as england, south aftrica, and australia do. and that is really astonishing.

]]>
By: Pat https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23833 Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:58:38 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23833 Here’s my test rankings based upon similar (but equally rational) prejudices to my good friend alex.

1. England
2. Pakistan
3. West Indies
4. New Zealand
5. Sri Lanka
6. India
7. South Africa
8. Australia

In light of King Cricket’s comments, I will accept that there are only a couple of points between SA and Australia.

]]>
By: pavan https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23831 Tue, 08 Dec 2009 06:27:42 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23831 I just wish India played south africa and beat them, then everybody would shut the fuck up.

]]>
By: Jonathan https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23828 Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:06:07 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23828 Well put.

]]>
By: D Charlton https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23825 Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:48:24 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23825 Cynical bating of supporters of the No.1 Test team in the world is either to be applauded or discarded.

I discard.

]]>
By: Deep Cower https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23823 Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:20:27 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23823 @alex: It’s both funny and sad how NZ didn’t get a mention even in your inebriated state.

]]>
By: alex https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23822 Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:11:04 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23822 I used shoddy, alcohol-fuelled reasoning and lazy prejudice to compile the following World Rankings-

1. England
2. India
3. South Africa
4. Sri Lanka
5. Pakistan
6. Australia
+ some other teams

]]>
By: Madhusudan Rao https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23820 Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:57:25 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23820 India justifies to be the No.1 site…their performances home and abroad justifies this.

]]>
By: daneel https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/icc-test-rankings-system/2009/12/07/#comment-23819 Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:23:40 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3323#comment-23819 The rankings only matter when they say England (or an English player) is good. Otherwise they are irrelevant.

The last time an ODI ranking was important, for example, was when Alan Mullally reached #2.

]]>