Comments on: Ed Cowan and other good Australian batsmen https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ed-cowan-and-other-good-australian-batsmen/2011/12/21/ Independent and irreverent cricket writing Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:48:28 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.3 By: thesaurusrus https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ed-cowan-and-other-good-australian-batsmen/2011/12/21/#comment-36769 Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:48:28 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=7790#comment-36769 able

]]>
By: thesaurusrus https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ed-cowan-and-other-good-australian-batsmen/2011/12/21/#comment-36768 Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:47:57 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=7790#comment-36768 Inverarity said Marsh’s need to show his back can stand up.

He didn’t really say anything after that apart from not mentioning the unmentionalbe

]]>
By: King Cricket https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ed-cowan-and-other-good-australian-batsmen/2011/12/21/#comment-36766 Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:17:04 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=7790#comment-36766 In reply to Ritesh Banglani.

Must… resist…

]]>
By: Ritesh Banglani https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ed-cowan-and-other-good-australian-batsmen/2011/12/21/#comment-36765 Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:49:52 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=7790#comment-36765 Ladies and gentlemen

*drumroll*

Shaun Marsh’s back

]]>
By: Deep Cower https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ed-cowan-and-other-good-australian-batsmen/2011/12/21/#comment-36764 Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:34:01 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=7790#comment-36764 In reply to Bert.

Bert, this is easily achieved. You simply have to start calling the Bangladeshi side “Australia”. Fits the bill perfectly.

]]>
By: Bert https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/ed-cowan-and-other-good-australian-batsmen/2011/12/21/#comment-36762 Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:53:48 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=7790#comment-36762 Humbug.

But you are right as usual. Hughes, Johnson, Doherty, Clarke – these were all huge fun, but it could never last. Sooner or later CA would realise that selecting comedy characters for the test team might be well received in England and New Zealand, but wouldn’t ensure a sustained challenge for major honours. Ah well.

What we need is a series of almost-good-enough-to-play-test-cricket-but-not-quite players. You know the ones, brimful of “talent” and “potential”, but somehow unable to average more than (or less than, depending on their job) 35. You know, Graham Hick. These are the players that can stick around in the team, preventing both success and anyone else getting in instead, because there is always something about them that keeps them in the team. I have hopes for Warner, although he might turn out to be a good player, and maybe one of the set of 12 year old fast bowlers they’ve been picking.

]]>