Comments on: Carlos Brathwaite v Physics https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/carlos-brathwaite-v-physics/2019/06/23/ Independent and irreverent cricket writing Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:49:23 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.3 By: Bail-out https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/carlos-brathwaite-v-physics/2019/06/23/#comment-259503 Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:49:23 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21618#comment-259503 In reply to Rhys.

They’ve spent this four-year World Cup cycle using their losses up in a more efficient way than England.

]]>
By: Alphamonkey https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/carlos-brathwaite-v-physics/2019/06/23/#comment-259502 Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:45:30 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21618#comment-259502 In reply to King Cricket.

Looked like the delivery that got Buttler was a no ball to me, but Sky haven’t shown a replay :/

]]>
By: Alphamonkey https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/carlos-brathwaite-v-physics/2019/06/23/#comment-259501 Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:23:44 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21618#comment-259501 In reply to sam.

It’s clear that Jason Roy needs play the next game even it’s with a runner. Failing that open with Moeen/Woakes and get TC or Plunkett in down the order. Anything not to have to hear about how Vince is too talented not to come good eventually.

]]>
By: Sam https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/carlos-brathwaite-v-physics/2019/06/23/#comment-259500 Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:11:39 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21618#comment-259500 In reply to King Cricket.

Good point. There are perfectly serviceable toilet cubicles right here.

]]>
By: King Cricket https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/carlos-brathwaite-v-physics/2019/06/23/#comment-259499 Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:48:22 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21618#comment-259499 In reply to Sam.

Why do you have to go home to start?

]]>
By: Sam https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/carlos-brathwaite-v-physics/2019/06/23/#comment-259498 Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:46:03 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21618#comment-259498 Can I go home and start crying yet?

]]>
By: Bert https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/carlos-brathwaite-v-physics/2019/06/23/#comment-259497 Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:00:26 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21618#comment-259497 See, you lot have no idea. There you all were thinking England were going to come up well short of Australia’s impressive 340 or so, whereas instead they have opted to fail against a modest 285. There is literally no total too small for this England side to fail to chase.

]]>
By: King Cricket https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/carlos-brathwaite-v-physics/2019/06/23/#comment-259496 Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:49:11 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21618#comment-259496 In reply to A P Webster.

Smart move to bowl so badly really.

]]>
By: A P Webster https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/carlos-brathwaite-v-physics/2019/06/23/#comment-259495 Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:42:31 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21618#comment-259495 In reply to sam.

I presume the ‘England are better chasing 350 than 230’ theory will be tested today

]]>
By: Rhys https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/carlos-brathwaite-v-physics/2019/06/23/#comment-259494 Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:04:04 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21618#comment-259494 Have Australia been match fixing for the past 3 years?

]]>