Comments on: Goldenarms: The best part-time bowlers in the history of Test cricket https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/goldenarms-the-best-part-time-bowlers-in-the-history-of-test-cricket/2020/11/18/ Independent and irreverent cricket writing Sat, 21 Nov 2020 15:39:25 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.3 By: Uday https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/goldenarms-the-best-part-time-bowlers-in-the-history-of-test-cricket/2020/11/18/#comment-265456 Sat, 21 Nov 2020 15:39:25 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=23977#comment-265456 I move the qualification criteria be amended to exclude anyone who played in a strong bowling side. They would have really come on just to give the main bowlers a breather, and the opposition batsmen would have gotten out trying their damndest to hit them out of the ground. They wouldn’t be a hopeful spanner tossed at the opposition’s works as much as a spanner placed there while the wrench was getting de-greased to do its thing.

This would also have the advantage of removing most of the Aussies on this list.

]]>
By: A P Webster https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/goldenarms-the-best-part-time-bowlers-in-the-history-of-test-cricket/2020/11/18/#comment-265455 Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:55:51 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=23977#comment-265455 In reply to Chabuddy.

Cook’s figures should by rights just be added onto Bob Willis’, given that he was doing an impression at the time.

]]>
By: A P Webster https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/goldenarms-the-best-part-time-bowlers-in-the-history-of-test-cricket/2020/11/18/#comment-265454 Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:54:43 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=23977#comment-265454 In reply to King Cricket.

I remember Gayle’s bowling trademark as being an annoying ‘aborted’ run-up to anyone who was just short of a batting milestone, to put them on edge.

He may have done this as many as one or two times.

]]>
By: King Cricket https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/goldenarms-the-best-part-time-bowlers-in-the-history-of-test-cricket/2020/11/18/#comment-265451 Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:05:27 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=23977#comment-265451 In reply to Micko.

Also, if conditions were such that Malcolm Marshall couldn’t take a wicket then the part-timers were probably on a hiding to nothing.

]]>
By: Micko https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/goldenarms-the-best-part-time-bowlers-in-the-history-of-test-cricket/2020/11/18/#comment-265450 Fri, 20 Nov 2020 05:10:37 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=23977#comment-265450 Looking at the arse end of the strike rates of people who have 10 wickets list is quite interesting. Clive Lloyd has the worst strike rate at 171.6, with Viv Richards and Larry Gomes 3rd and 4th worst respectively. I wonder if this was due to the West Indies utmost conviction to the 4 fast bowlers strategy in this period that when a team actually batted OK against them and the quicks got tired these part timers had to bowl a lot more than their skill warranted.

]]>
By: Chabuddy https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/goldenarms-the-best-part-time-bowlers-in-the-history-of-test-cricket/2020/11/18/#comment-265449 Thu, 19 Nov 2020 21:13:03 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=23977#comment-265449 shame we cant just say that Alister Cook is the best bowler of all time

]]>
By: Bail-out https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/goldenarms-the-best-part-time-bowlers-in-the-history-of-test-cricket/2020/11/18/#comment-265448 Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:32:02 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=23977#comment-265448 In reply to Mike_2.

Why did a side with such a strong regular bowling line-up even need extra part-time bowlers? That’s a mystery in itself, though I suppose their lack of an outright all-rounder goes some way to explain it. I reckon if the Aussie bowling attack of that time had been weaker, a couple of these candidates would actually have been deployed as all-rounderishes.

]]>
By: Bail-out https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/goldenarms-the-best-part-time-bowlers-in-the-history-of-test-cricket/2020/11/18/#comment-265447 Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:29:53 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=23977#comment-265447 In reply to King Cricket.

Or old and forgetful. But think it says much about your good grace, Yer Maj, that you opted for lithe and young.

]]>
By: Mike_2 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/goldenarms-the-best-part-time-bowlers-in-the-history-of-test-cricket/2020/11/18/#comment-265446 Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:38:43 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=23977#comment-265446 I’m a bit worried that the conclusion to this article is that Australia’s ’90-’00s side was so good that even their specialist batsman were great bowlers. One might start to credit their mentality.

]]>
By: Deep Cower https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/goldenarms-the-best-part-time-bowlers-in-the-history-of-test-cricket/2020/11/18/#comment-265445 Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:51:58 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=23977#comment-265445 In reply to Ged Ladd.

Ged’s case is strong KC – it’s well-known that when Katich’s wickets were counted in that shack where they count wickets, no non-Australians were allowed anywhere near. This reeks of fraud it does.

]]>