Comments on: Michael Clarke is a proper batsman https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/michael-clarke-is-a-proper-batsman/2009/01/06/ Independent and irreverent cricket writing Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:58:51 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.3 By: SarahCanterbury https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/michael-clarke-is-a-proper-batsman/2009/01/06/#comment-14952 Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:58:51 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=767#comment-14952 I love your word “ditheration”. I’m going to use that today.

]]>
By: Ged Ladd https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/michael-clarke-is-a-proper-batsman/2009/01/06/#comment-14950 Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:33:38 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=767#comment-14950 Now there’s an idea for a new KC series – photographs of sad locations for cricketing memorabilia in people’s homes.

And/or short features on same.

I’d gladly submit a couple of pics/features for that.

]]>
By: e normous https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/michael-clarke-is-a-proper-batsman/2009/01/06/#comment-14940 Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:50:22 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=767#comment-14940 WHA? how about some pics?

]]>
By: miriam https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/michael-clarke-is-a-proper-batsman/2009/01/06/#comment-14939 Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:27:47 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=767#comment-14939 I did indeed win the cricket bat competition at the lingerie website! Said bat is now in my lounge, along with the signed Sachin Tendulkar cricket boot that I got for Christmas.

]]>
By: Suave https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/michael-clarke-is-a-proper-batsman/2009/01/06/#comment-14938 Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:08:51 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=767#comment-14938 Ed, all I can remember is that Miriam won it. That was a long time ago.

]]>
By: Ed https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/michael-clarke-is-a-proper-batsman/2009/01/06/#comment-14937 Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:06:24 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=767#comment-14937 Can you tell me how the “cricket bat competition at a lingerie website” worked please?

]]>
By: e normous https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/michael-clarke-is-a-proper-batsman/2009/01/06/#comment-14936 Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:49:20 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=767#comment-14936 Clarke is not fun anymore. AB de Villiers is not fun anymore. Pietersen too, though that last hundred was a bit of a throwback to 05.

I don’t think Bell is especially talented at all. Yes, his shots look very nice on the rare occassions he gets them right, but that’s it.

]]>
By: King Cricket https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/michael-clarke-is-a-proper-batsman/2009/01/06/#comment-14935 Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:22:30 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=767#comment-14935 Someone knows what it is. It’s not us though.

We gave away some books once and also advertised a cricket bat competition at a lingerie website. Think that’s it though.

]]>
By: A P Webster https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/michael-clarke-is-a-proper-batsman/2009/01/06/#comment-14933 Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:05:00 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=767#comment-14933 That thing that turns apostrophes into accented As and trademarked Euros is really annoying.

]]>
By: A P Webster https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/michael-clarke-is-a-proper-batsman/2009/01/06/#comment-14932 Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:03:08 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=767#comment-14932 s which - not because it’s easy, but because we never have prizes" You did have a prize once, didn't you? Not for guessing whether Clarke was better than Bell, but for something.]]> “No prizes for guessing which one’s which – not because it’s easy, but because we never have prizes”

You did have a prize once, didn’t you? Not for guessing whether Clarke was better than Bell, but for something.

]]>