Comments on: Loots Bosman and Graeme Smith should play on ‘hard’ now https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/loots-bosman-and-graeme-smith-should-play-on-hard-now/2009/11/15/ Independent and irreverent cricket writing Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:40:05 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.3 By: Stuart https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/loots-bosman-and-graeme-smith-should-play-on-hard-now/2009/11/15/#comment-23533 Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:06:40 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3169#comment-23533 Sajid is back with a bang. I think England missed a trick by putting him at number 11, though, after his exploits batting at 8 in Australia in 2006/07.

]]> By: Ged https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/loots-bosman-and-graeme-smith-should-play-on-hard-now/2009/11/15/#comment-23531 Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:50:49 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3169#comment-23531 Loots is a great first name for a cricket, don’t ya think?

Especially for a batsman who steals run candies from bowling babies.

]]> By: wolf https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/loots-bosman-and-graeme-smith-should-play-on-hard-now/2009/11/15/#comment-23526 Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:07:08 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3169#comment-23526 Funny you should mention this – I was playing the truly abysmal ashes cricket on the wii today against England and scored 241 in 20 overs.

I only lost 3 wickets though 😉

]]> By: Dave https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/loots-bosman-and-graeme-smith-should-play-on-hard-now/2009/11/15/#comment-23525 Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:23:13 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=3169#comment-23525 Ah, so they were playing on easy mode? I wondered why Saj was playing.

]]>