Comments on: James Anderson and swing bowling https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/james-anderson-and-swing-bowling/2010/08/01/ Independent and irreverent cricket writing Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:59:24 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.3 By: Ged https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/james-anderson-and-swing-bowling/2010/08/01/#comment-27147 Tue, 03 Aug 2010 05:40:51 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=4737#comment-27147 Surely the interesting thing in the run up to the Ashes is that the Aussie bowlers were so much less effective against the same gash batting line up.

Yes, it is English conditions and an English ball, surely that is only a smidgeon of the point.

I like those dark malty winter ales. What’s the matter with you, KC?

]]>
By: The Smudge https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/james-anderson-and-swing-bowling/2010/08/01/#comment-27146 Tue, 03 Aug 2010 05:35:31 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=4737#comment-27146 Couldn’t agree more KC. What bowler in history has ever got 11 plus wickets in conditions that weren’t favourable to their style of bowling? I’ve never heard anyone say “That Jim Laker was crap, he got his 19 wickets on a turner and some of the batsmen not only weren’t very good, but played bad shots”

]]>
By: Husky https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/james-anderson-and-swing-bowling/2010/08/01/#comment-27144 Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:01:53 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=4737#comment-27144 Anyone with a brain takes into account the quality of the batsmen being dismissed. Would it be a monumental thing if he knocked over the local school XI?

He did a good job worthy of praise but at least keep it in perspective.

]]>
By: Sofa Soph https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/james-anderson-and-swing-bowling/2010/08/01/#comment-27137 Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:04:21 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=4737#comment-27137 Here, here. I cannot abide all this bloody nay-saying about Anderson only taking wickets in swinging conditions.

Do people really think that the England selectors are unaware that he won’t be as effective in Australia as he is in England?

It doesn’t mean his really very effective bowling in England has any less value.

]]>
By: The Reverse Sweep https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/james-anderson-and-swing-bowling/2010/08/01/#comment-27136 Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:07:47 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=4737#comment-27136 Couldn’t agree more. Match figures of 11 for 71 are pretty special any day of the week. It certainly earns Anderson full marks in our marks out of ten.

England marks out of ten http://bit.ly/brj7mf

Pakistan marks out of ten http://bit.ly/dlaGfk

]]>
By: Deep Cower https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/james-anderson-and-swing-bowling/2010/08/01/#comment-27134 Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:23:23 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=4737#comment-27134 Husky – Crap batting line-up or not, it’s nice to see bowlers doing well once in a while.

]]>
By: Bobby K https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/james-anderson-and-swing-bowling/2010/08/01/#comment-27129 Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:29:33 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=4737#comment-27129 Followed closely by Mohammed Yussuf, the Pakistani Panacea.

]]>
By: Dandy Dan https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/james-anderson-and-swing-bowling/2010/08/01/#comment-27122 Mon, 02 Aug 2010 02:56:19 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=4737#comment-27122 Shit. I’ve been out on the beer again. What do I do?

]]>
By: Husky https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/james-anderson-and-swing-bowling/2010/08/01/#comment-27118 Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:27:12 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=4737#comment-27118 I wouldn’t call knocking over this Pakistan batting line-up a monumental thing. On recent evidence even the Bangladeshi’s could claim to have the better batting.

]]>
By: thesaurusrus https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/james-anderson-and-swing-bowling/2010/08/01/#comment-27115 Sun, 01 Aug 2010 22:38:25 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=4737#comment-27115 how do they make the dukes of swing ball? surely the aussies could invent a boomerang? too much red wine to fid rhe caps key

]]>