Comments on: A successful England run chase – but it never would have lasted https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/a-successful-england-run-chase-but-it-never-would-have-lasted/2014/12/03/ Independent and irreverent cricket writing Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:27:08 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.3 By: daneel https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/a-successful-england-run-chase-but-it-never-would-have-lasted/2014/12/03/#comment-233244 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:27:08 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=12770#comment-233244 In reply to Ged.

Drop Morgan too. Make Bell captain.

]]>
By: Sam https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/a-successful-england-run-chase-but-it-never-would-have-lasted/2014/12/03/#comment-233241 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:14:43 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=12770#comment-233241 In reply to Howe.

Slapheadtweakery

]]>
By: Bert https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/a-successful-england-run-chase-but-it-never-would-have-lasted/2014/12/03/#comment-233236 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:44:46 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=12770#comment-233236 In reply to Ged.

How can someone from the right sort of family even do such a thing? It’s just not possible. No, what must have happened is that Cook did so much moving during the day that time became expanded for him relative to the stationary David Boon. So while on Boon’s watch Cook was ten minutes late, on Cook’s watch he was a polite minute early.

]]>
By: King Cricket https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/a-successful-england-run-chase-but-it-never-would-have-lasted/2014/12/03/#comment-233224 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:39:01 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=12770#comment-233224 In reply to Howe.

Not consciously, although your saying that does make us realise that one of our earliest coinings – ‘innocuoso’ – is perfectly suited to James Tredwell.

]]>
By: Howe https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/a-successful-england-run-chase-but-it-never-would-have-lasted/2014/12/03/#comment-233220 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:54:51 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=12770#comment-233220 fourvalanche
pseudo-keeper
nurdlesome

are you using this series to warm up for the world cup in your own way, that is, come up with as many ODI-related neologisms as possible in attempt to get some into common parlance by February

]]>
By: Balladeer https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/a-successful-england-run-chase-but-it-never-would-have-lasted/2014/12/03/#comment-233207 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:13:15 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=12770#comment-233207 In reply to Ged.

As somebody put in Cricinfo, “the second most out-of-form batsman hands over the captaincy to the most out-of-form batsman”.

]]>
By: Sam https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/a-successful-england-run-chase-but-it-never-would-have-lasted/2014/12/03/#comment-233192 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:41:37 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=12770#comment-233192 In reply to Ged.

Revolution time. Please, let the new top three all score heavily in a Morgan-masterminded victory.

]]>
By: Ged https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/a-successful-england-run-chase-but-it-never-would-have-lasted/2014/12/03/#comment-233184 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:27:23 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=12770#comment-233184 In related news, how dare that trumped-up official, Boon, penalise our beloved captain with a suspension:

http://www.espncricinfo.com/sri-lanka-v-england-2014-15/content/current/story/807251.html

When you come from the right sort of family, sometimes you need to take your time over things. Petty bureaucrats from the colonies rarely understand these subtleties. A shameful act of jobsworthiness.

]]>
By: Bert https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/a-successful-england-run-chase-but-it-never-would-have-lasted/2014/12/03/#comment-233158 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:00:29 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=12770#comment-233158 In reply to Graeme.

The difference between 242 and 232 is 10. Right? Hold that number in your head. Now take the difference between the proper number of overs (50) and the actual number of overs (35). That difference is also roughly 10. That can’t be a coincidence, can it, so therefore dividing both sides by 7 will give the required correction coefficient lambda. Remember, you must get your parents’ permission before doing this last step.

]]>
By: Ged https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/a-successful-england-run-chase-but-it-never-would-have-lasted/2014/12/03/#comment-233124 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 07:28:05 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=12770#comment-233124 In reply to Deep Cower.

The New Yorker occasionally has a blitz on portmanteau words, Deep Cower. Here is one example of such an article:

http://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/questioningly-needia-fauxlaws-and-other-new-words

In one earlier incarnation of that article, I literally laughed out loud at the definition of the portmanteau word ignoranus – someone who is both an imbecile and an asshole. Sadly, I have cause to think of this word rather too often in real life. Happily, not so around here amongst the King Cricket crowd.

]]>