Comments on: Does sweeping damn near everything actually work? https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/does-sweeping-damn-near-everything-actually-work/2018/11/16/ Independent and irreverent cricket writing Thu, 22 Nov 2018 15:47:28 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.3 By: Mike https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/does-sweeping-damn-near-everything-actually-work/2018/11/16/#comment-257427 Thu, 22 Nov 2018 15:47:28 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=20582#comment-257427 In reply to Sam.

https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/mohammad-abbas-could-get-hold-of-your-phone-number-and-so-could-naseem-shah/2018/10/17/

You are nothing if not consistent, Sam!

]]>
By: Sam https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/does-sweeping-damn-near-everything-actually-work/2018/11/16/#comment-257389 Mon, 19 Nov 2018 06:50:58 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=20582#comment-257389 In reply to Ged Ladd.

Dan Norcross referred to his dismissal as a ‘Big swinging Dickwella’, which I thought was excellent.

]]>
By: King Cricket https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/does-sweeping-damn-near-everything-actually-work/2018/11/16/#comment-257385 Sun, 18 Nov 2018 14:31:35 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=20582#comment-257385 In reply to Howe.

That’s a very good point.

]]>
By: Howe https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/does-sweeping-damn-near-everything-actually-work/2018/11/16/#comment-257384 Sun, 18 Nov 2018 11:50:13 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=20582#comment-257384 It’s not true that the shots being played is entirely the decision of the batting side. Lakmal could have cut off those areas of the field but he didn’t, because he thought (reasonably) that the England batsmen were more likely to get out sweeping than they would be if there were gaps for one in front of square for the spinners.

This is one of those game theory like cases where both parties making the calculated decision results in one outcome.

]]>
By: Ged Ladd https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/does-sweeping-damn-near-everything-actually-work/2018/11/16/#comment-257378 Sat, 17 Nov 2018 14:06:09 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=20582#comment-257378 In similar news, Daisy’s idiosyncratic hearing of Southern Asian names as English names…

…of which “Sir Alf Ganguly” remains somewhat of a pinnacle…

…has swept new depths, when this morning Daisy decided that, with a name like Dick Weller, the Sri Lankan sweeper-keeper should be playing for England.

I wonder whether Dick Weller is related to the musician Paul Weller?

]]>
By: Sam https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/does-sweeping-damn-near-everything-actually-work/2018/11/16/#comment-257377 Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:56:54 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=20582#comment-257377 In reply to Ged.

SuperKaluwitharanaMoeenAliDocious

Shut up.

]]>
By: Sam https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/does-sweeping-damn-near-everything-actually-work/2018/11/16/#comment-257376 Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:53:24 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=20582#comment-257376 In reply to Steve.

Why does Rash get a first name but the others don’t?

]]>
By: Os https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/does-sweeping-damn-near-everything-actually-work/2018/11/16/#comment-257373 Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:16:16 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=20582#comment-257373 https://youtu.be/irL7ZCq7l2A

Play a sweep on its merits

]]>
By: Ged https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/does-sweeping-damn-near-everything-actually-work/2018/11/16/#comment-257372 Fri, 16 Nov 2018 15:40:06 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=20582#comment-257372 Oy aint seen thems many sweeps since Mary Poppins…

https://youtu.be/kG6O4N3wxf8

…and there’s no mistake.

]]>
By: Steve https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/does-sweeping-damn-near-everything-actually-work/2018/11/16/#comment-257371 Fri, 16 Nov 2018 14:44:23 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=20582#comment-257371 Foakes has also been slightly less sweepier. Can probably split it into 4 groups.

Quickest on feet, so sweepy but not overly so – Root, Foakes, Curran
Players that need a gameplan, Gameplan A has been designated as “sweep”, so very sweepy – Stokes, Burns, Moeen, Leach
Good sweepers, so very, very sweepy – Buttler, Jennings, Anderson
Adil Rashid

I guess the key question is thus – If England batted in any other way, would they score more runs? I’m fairly confident the answer is no . I think sweeping the shit out of everything has its limitations (namely you keep getting out to the sweep shot), but at the same time you can’t expect these players to turn into Rahul Dravid just because you are playing in the subcontinent.

]]>