Comments on: England’s reactive batting https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/englands-reactive-batting/2014/06/10/ Independent and irreverent cricket writing Thu, 12 Jun 2014 22:44:40 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.3 By: cent https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/englands-reactive-batting/2014/06/10/#comment-68864 Thu, 12 Jun 2014 22:44:40 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=11959#comment-68864 the revival! it begins here… corner turned… next stop, world number one ranking and all that.

what?

]]>
By: Ged https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/englands-reactive-batting/2014/06/10/#comment-68861 Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:27:56 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=11959#comment-68861 There you are folks, that doesn’t look too bad at all.

Good launch pad for two days at Lord’s for yours truly.

]]>
By: daneel https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/englands-reactive-batting/2014/06/10/#comment-68859 Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:34:03 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=11959#comment-68859 This Prior bloke is rubbish.

]]>
By: Deep Cower https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/englands-reactive-batting/2014/06/10/#comment-68856 Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:12:51 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=11959#comment-68856 In reply to Deep Cower.

Curioser and curioser.

ItsNotJustCrick: “All this talk about dominating and batting fast is ridiculous. New Zealand just steamrollered the Windies and they batted under 3 an over for most of the 1st innings. Big scores intimidate teams, not fast scoring! England need to concentrate on accumulating.”

]]>
By: Deep Cower https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/englands-reactive-batting/2014/06/10/#comment-68855 Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:05:11 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=11959#comment-68855 KC is posting comments on cricinfo under a different name now:

James The Score: “Root can accumulate but he doesn’t dominate. He’s not going to cause teams a rethink like, for example, a KP would do. Credit to Root for battling it out though – he’s playing his game.”

]]>
By: sam https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/englands-reactive-batting/2014/06/10/#comment-68854 Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:25:48 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=11959#comment-68854 In reply to Ceci.

Oh dear

]]>
By: Ceci https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/englands-reactive-batting/2014/06/10/#comment-68853 Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:05:21 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=11959#comment-68853 Can I be the first to say that at the moment England have got their MoJoe working?

]]>
By: Bert https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/englands-reactive-batting/2014/06/10/#comment-68849 Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:19:35 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=11959#comment-68849 My lunch prediction has died, as has my tea prediction.

But my stumps prediction is still alive, and if not kicking, at least twitching occasionally.

]]>
By: Ged https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/englands-reactive-batting/2014/06/10/#comment-68848 Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:24:22 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=11959#comment-68848 Calm down, dears. It’s only a cricket match.

]]>
By: Balladeer https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/englands-reactive-batting/2014/06/10/#comment-68847 Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:20:22 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=11959#comment-68847 In reply to Balladeer.

Which is better than Robson, who has just made the selection of Carberry for the Ashes look like a bastion of sanity.

]]>