Comments on: Which ridiculous Ashes series should we cover next? https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/which-ridiculous-ashes-series-should-we-cover-next/2021/03/08/ Independent and irreverent cricket writing Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:00:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.3 By: Howe https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/which-ridiculous-ashes-series-should-we-cover-next/2021/03/08/#comment-266407 Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:00:04 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=25296#comment-266407 I’m not on Twitter so I can’t vote, but I feel like 2013 (the summer one) deserves a lot more love than it gets. It was very strange fight between a side that was rubbish and about to become good yet and a side that was straining but hadn’t fallen apart yet, and then completely forgotten about after the story of that England team imploding during the return series four months later.

]]>
By: Ged Ladd https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/which-ridiculous-ashes-series-should-we-cover-next/2021/03/08/#comment-266380 Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:16:01 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=25296#comment-266380 In reply to King Cricket.

Why don’t you interview someone who is running for the 2013/14 party, Sam, thus weakening their chances of electoral success?

Your choice of 2013 ridiculousness has a connected Ged & Daisy story which is not yet writ on Ogblog. But it will be in the fulness of time…

…as will the Ridiculous Ashes 2013, I hope.

Personally I think the voting system has been gamed. If there had been two “down under” choices as well as two “right way up” choices, then I’m pretty sure one of the “right way up” choices would have won.

Democracy, as you day, Sam. Gerrymandered even in the matter of Ridiculous Twitter polls. Ricidculous.

]]>
By: Sam https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/which-ridiculous-ashes-series-should-we-cover-next/2021/03/08/#comment-266375 Tue, 09 Mar 2021 22:44:01 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=25296#comment-266375 In reply to King Cricket.

It’s democracy in action.

My vote goes to 2013, for this moment alone: https://youtu.be/Kk2cH1ApyIY

]]>
By: King Cricket https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/which-ridiculous-ashes-series-should-we-cover-next/2021/03/08/#comment-266374 Tue, 09 Mar 2021 15:41:53 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=25296#comment-266374 In reply to Ne.

Yeah, but almost two-thirds of them won’t listen because the ‘wrong’ series won.

]]>
By: Ne https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/which-ridiculous-ashes-series-should-we-cover-next/2021/03/08/#comment-266373 Tue, 09 Mar 2021 13:13:56 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=25296#comment-266373 you’ve had almost a thousand votes already. I find this startling (no offence like)

]]>
By: A P Webster https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/which-ridiculous-ashes-series-should-we-cover-next/2021/03/08/#comment-266372 Tue, 09 Mar 2021 12:50:59 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=25296#comment-266372 Is anyone following the Road Safety World Series?

I have three observations:
(1) Great sponsor name, it conjures up the idea of a competition between nations to have the safest roads, rather than a T20 ‘legends’ tournament
(2) Some of England’s legends seem, er, less legendary than the Tendulkar/Sehwag/Yuvraj level that India have managed. KP, Hoggard, Panesar – fair enough, but are Gavin Hamilton, Darren Maddy and Phil Mustard the sort of international superstars that justify the term ‘legend’?
(3) I can’t link directly to it at the moment, but on the England team page, the picture of Chris Tremlett seems to imply his forearms are as wide as his head. Tiny head, massive biceps, or Photoshop gone wrong?

]]>
By: Ged Ladd https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/which-ridiculous-ashes-series-should-we-cover-next/2021/03/08/#comment-266371 Tue, 09 Mar 2021 12:22:59 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=25296#comment-266371 Daisy wants to vote for 2009 but doesn’t do Twitter.

Frankly she has some of her own memorable ridiculousness for both her 2009 and 2013 appearances (never mind the cricketers).

I know you aren’t doing “pre Bowden/Liebke” Ashes series, but the most ridiculous day of Ashes I ever witnessed personally must have been my first one. Willis’s Day in 1977. Not only did he top score with the bat that (almost rain-ruined) day, but my friend Graham and I spotted him (and even spoke with him) on the London Underground:

http://ianlouisharris.com/1977/08/27/my-first-ever-day-at-a-test-match-with-graham-majin-england-v-australia-day-3-oval-27-august-1977/

It occurs to me that you might have a rain-ruined match in one of your ridiculous Ashes series, in which you do what the commentators do in the real Ashes – show/discuss some ridiculousness from a bygone era to use up some broadcasting time.

]]>
By: King Cricket https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/which-ridiculous-ashes-series-should-we-cover-next/2021/03/08/#comment-266370 Tue, 09 Mar 2021 12:00:40 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=25296#comment-266370 In reply to Adam.

Yeah, we’re definitely looking forward to that one. We just thought it was maybe a little too recent for Series 2.

]]>
By: Adam https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/which-ridiculous-ashes-series-should-we-cover-next/2021/03/08/#comment-266369 Mon, 08 Mar 2021 22:05:27 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=25296#comment-266369 It seems like 2013-14 is narrowly leading at the moment. That’s obviously bad, but seeing as this is the Ridiculous Ashes it should also allow England to claim an easy win.

I’d like to put forward 2015 for the future though. Every match was absolutely mad and seemed to bear no obvious connection to the others. 8-15? Australia being 337-1 at Lord’s? Steven Finn returning and taking 6? England being presented with the urn about 15 minutes after losing by an innings at the Oval? Two consecutive three-day Tests?

]]>
By: Aditya https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/which-ridiculous-ashes-series-should-we-cover-next/2021/03/08/#comment-266368 Mon, 08 Mar 2021 21:28:37 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=25296#comment-266368 I vote for the 2009 series because the ridiculousness of not winning at your most famous home ground, against your biggest rivals, for 75 years trumps everything else

]]>