Comments on: The pitch may well be unacceptable… https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/the-pitch-may-well-be-unacceptable/2015/04/25/ Independent and irreverent cricket writing Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:39:25 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.3 By: Sam https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/the-pitch-may-well-be-unacceptable/2015/04/25/#comment-237875 Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:39:25 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=13276#comment-237875 In reply to Bert.

Stats are stats, Ged. It’s a fact that they hadn’t won overseas since December 2012. There’s no such thing as a non-stat. It’s the context and tone in which it is reported which can make it misleading.

So there.

]]>
By: Ged https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/the-pitch-may-well-be-unacceptable/2015/04/25/#comment-237870 Sun, 26 Apr 2015 06:18:59 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=13276#comment-237870 In reply to Ged.

OY, you lot:

De quibus dicitur – ergo adulteri hoc bastardus bastardus?

]]>
By: Ged https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/the-pitch-may-well-be-unacceptable/2015/04/25/#comment-237869 Sun, 26 Apr 2015 06:10:49 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=13276#comment-237869 In reply to Bert.

It’s a bit of a non-stat, that December 2012 one, considering that this is only the third overseas test series since December 2012, the other two being Kiwiland early in 2013 (all matches drawn) and the series we don;t talk about in the Winter of 2013/14.

The lack of overseas test cricket in all that time is the real shocker of a stat.

A sense of foreboding remains about the coming summer, though, especially given that last couple of overseas series results.

Still, yesterday was an unexpected treat; Daisy and I had resigned ourselves to a probable bore draw day for Day Five, after watching the final chapters of Day Four on Friday evening.

]]>
By: daneel https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/the-pitch-may-well-be-unacceptable/2015/04/25/#comment-237868 Sat, 25 Apr 2015 20:46:40 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=13276#comment-237868 In reply to Bert.

My favourite part was when the Guardian whinged about Cook’s batting.

]]>
By: Sam https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/the-pitch-may-well-be-unacceptable/2015/04/25/#comment-237867 Sat, 25 Apr 2015 20:46:04 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=13276#comment-237867 In reply to Bert.

December 2012. Third Test v India.

]]>
By: Bert https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/the-pitch-may-well-be-unacceptable/2015/04/25/#comment-237866 Sat, 25 Apr 2015 20:40:34 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=13276#comment-237866 According to Cricinfo, this is England’s first test win overseas since November 2012.

]]>
By: Balladeer https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/the-pitch-may-well-be-unacceptable/2015/04/25/#comment-237865 Sat, 25 Apr 2015 18:25:08 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=13276#comment-237865 In reply to thesaurusrus.

Jonathan Trott nihil.

]]>
By: Ged https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/the-pitch-may-well-be-unacceptable/2015/04/25/#comment-237864 Sat, 25 Apr 2015 16:43:42 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=13276#comment-237864 In reply to Ged.

Whomesoever mught be grinding you down, KC. 😉

]]>
By: thesaurusrus https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/the-pitch-may-well-be-unacceptable/2015/04/25/#comment-237863 Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:53:48 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=13276#comment-237863 Anderson V-III-III-III

]]>
By: King Cricket https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/the-pitch-may-well-be-unacceptable/2015/04/25/#comment-237862 Sat, 25 Apr 2015 12:13:00 +0000 http://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=13276#comment-237862 In reply to Ged.

Who are you calling a bastard?

]]>