Comments on: What score should we give that mad Ben Stokes catch? https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/what-score-should-we-give-that-mad-ben-stokes-catch/2019/05/30/ Independent and irreverent cricket writing Fri, 31 May 2019 15:49:32 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.3 By: Bail-out https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/what-score-should-we-give-that-mad-ben-stokes-catch/2019/05/30/#comment-259177 Fri, 31 May 2019 15:49:32 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21467#comment-259177 In reply to Ged Ladd.

Overall, bails failing to fall are maybe less ama-zing than they used to be.

(Needs some work, this one.)

]]>
By: Bail-out https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/what-score-should-we-give-that-mad-ben-stokes-catch/2019/05/30/#comment-259176 Fri, 31 May 2019 15:48:25 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21467#comment-259176 In reply to Ged Ladd.

But on the other hand I’m definitely not the only person to have wondered about the zing bails either:

https://indianexpress.com/article/sports/ipl/ipl-2019-zing-bail-fails-a-talking-point-in-season-12-5723115/

]]>
By: Bail-out https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/what-score-should-we-give-that-mad-ben-stokes-catch/2019/05/30/#comment-259175 Fri, 31 May 2019 15:47:06 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21467#comment-259175 In reply to Ged Ladd.

There’s a nice compilation of bails-not-out clips here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtJIesTuLrk

With a good selection of both zing and unzingy bails failing to drop.

]]>
By: King Cricket https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/what-score-should-we-give-that-mad-ben-stokes-catch/2019/05/30/#comment-259171 Fri, 31 May 2019 13:20:56 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21467#comment-259171 In reply to Chuck.

We do this sometimes. Rarely two on the bounce though.

]]>
By: Chuck https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/what-score-should-we-give-that-mad-ben-stokes-catch/2019/05/30/#comment-259170 Fri, 31 May 2019 13:11:55 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21467#comment-259170 First the Petulance Index and now calculating the exact percentage of ‘amazing’. You’ve gone all maths-y and scientific, as if numbers can prove anything,

]]>
By: Sam https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/what-score-should-we-give-that-mad-ben-stokes-catch/2019/05/30/#comment-259169 Fri, 31 May 2019 12:58:19 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21467#comment-259169 In reply to Mike.

They will obviously win the tournament.

]]>
By: Ged https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/what-score-should-we-give-that-mad-ben-stokes-catch/2019/05/30/#comment-259168 Fri, 31 May 2019 12:17:39 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21467#comment-259168 In reply to Ged Ladd.

I suspect illusion, Bail-out.

When it is windy, it is standard practice to use heavier bails and that is not deemed to make a material difference to the ability of a ball actually to dislodge a bail…

…and it is the dislodging of at least one bail from its groove that is the very definition of, e.g. whether or not the batsman is bowled.

Your user name on this site, Bail-out, is the quintessential user name for this particular discussion, I realise.

]]>
By: Bail-out https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/what-score-should-we-give-that-mad-ben-stokes-catch/2019/05/30/#comment-259166 Fri, 31 May 2019 11:27:13 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21467#comment-259166 In reply to Ged Ladd.

Those are both good calls and I remember but can’t quite place a few more, but I have the feeling that it’s been more common with the flashing bails, or has happened with heftier looking blows to the stumps. Or maybe it’s all an availability illusion?

]]>
By: Mike https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/what-score-should-we-give-that-mad-ben-stokes-catch/2019/05/30/#comment-259165 Fri, 31 May 2019 11:26:34 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21467#comment-259165 More purest Pakistanery from Pakistan, so it is.

]]>
By: Sam https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/what-score-should-we-give-that-mad-ben-stokes-catch/2019/05/30/#comment-259164 Fri, 31 May 2019 09:28:38 +0000 https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/?p=21467#comment-259164 In reply to Ged Ladd.

Lara’s pull shot to go past 365.

]]>